7 July 2006
The ARLA/NAEA consultation process is moving forward to consider the
broad structures that could be involved in any amalgamation of
interests.
Following the formation of a joint working group and full
discussions at the level of each organisation’s Councils, it was
seen that in order to satisfy and safeguard the interests of each
organisation and its members there will be the need for an
overarching board to be formed with directors drawn from each
organisation and possibly an independent chairman.
There would be two divisions, each retaining its own brand name,
ARLA and NAEA, and operating with their own Presidents. They would
be overseen by a streamlined and more transparent governance
structure. The management board of the new overall company would
oversee the working operational framework, consider wider strategy
and policy issues and set budgets.
A single secretariat would facilitate all the common operational and
support functions across the divisions.
This is seen as the most productive way to draw on the combined
strengths of each organisation. It can preserve their integrity and
expertise and let them remain focussed on their own sectors of the
property industry. This structure also allows for the future
development of other specialist divisions or the involvement of any
other representative body that might be interested in joining in the
future.
The joint leaders of consultations, NAEA President Charles Smailes
and ARLA President Robert Jordan said, "Both organisations are
working hard on the outline proposals that, if recommended by the ARLA and NAEA
Councils, will be put to our memberships for comment and a decision
at Extraordinary General Meetings. These will be held
simultaneously, probably before the end of the year."
The two Presidents concluded that there is still a lot of work to be
done on all the various options that should be put to the
memberships. "It will be impossible and impracticable to have every
last detail finalised at this stage. However, we must ensure that
sufficient information on the broad details and structure are given
to our members so that they, and they alone, can make a decision
about whether we then move forward to an amalgamation," they said.