Latest News

GDPR: Keep calm and carry out an audit

12 December 2017

With a major change to data protection legislation looming in May 2018, there is a growing chorus claiming there will be calamity over compliance. Tales of being fined €20m and losing the ability to market to your existing client database are somewhat exaggerated though. Neil Manito, Product Owner at Reapit, offers a measured view of what GDPR means to estate agency and lettings… Read More...

Propertymark Share Predictions for 2018

11 December 2017

PRESS RELEASE: As we approach the New Year, there are a number of hurdles on the horizon but scope to remain hopeful. With further interest rate rises expected, Brexit negotiations to overcome and the cost of living escalating, the property market could see significant changes. NAEA Propertymark and ARLA Propertymark share their predictions for the rental/buying market, looking ahead to 2018 Read More...

Banning Orders - not open enough and no combined list

Friday 17 February 2017

ARLA Propertymark has recently responded to the Government’s consultation on what offences will constitute a banning order under the Housing and Planning Act 2016.

We are pleased that the Government has consulted on banning orders in order to clarify what these offences will include, but we are concerned about the openness of the register and believe that being banned under Estate Agents Act 1979 should also constitute a banning order offence under the Housing and Planning Act 2016.

In relation to the register, it seems completely illogical and defeats the purpose of the legislation that the database of rogue landlords and letting agents will only be accessible to local authorities and the Department for communities and Local Government. If there is no public access to the database how will landlords or tenants know if they are using a banned agent and how do agents see if those applying for employment are blacklisted or banned.  

Furthermore, we believe that access to the list should be granted to industry bodies such as ARLA Propertymark. As the largest professional body for letting agents in the UK unless we are included we will not know if our members are banned or blacklisted. Additionally, access to the register will allow us to ensure we can take the appropriate action against any member on the list.

Many letting agents are also sales agents and therefore regulated under the Estate Agents Act 1979. Consequently, we believe that being banned under Estate Agents Act 1979 should also constitute a banning order offence under the Housing and Planning Act 2016. Without combining the lists, there is a very real danger that a banned sales agent could set up as a letting agent or vice versa which will do little to improve the industry.

On the whole ARLA Propertymark agrees with the housing offences that have been set out by the Government which should be regarded as banning order offences. We have, however, recommended to the Government that they also consider including letting agents who do not display their fees in accordance with the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and agencies who are not members of a redress scheme under the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 as banning order offences.

In addition, on the offence for allowing a HMO that is not subject to licensing to become overcrowded we believe there must be safeguards in place against prosecution when tenants overcrowd without consent or knowledge of the landlord.

Read ARLA Propertymark’s response to the consultation

The Housing White Paper in February reiterated the Government’s desire to implement measures introduced in the Housing and Planning Act 2016. We expect banning orders to come into force on 1 October 2017.